Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Groton Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 5, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoultoN, C. J.

The Groton Manufacturing Company, a corporation, is now and has been for some years past in the hands of a receiver, appointed by the Court of Chancery upon the application of certain of its creditors. The Woodsville Guaranty Savings Bank, hereinafter called the petitioner, a creditor holding mortgages upon the real estate of the insolvent corporation, was made a party defendant in the receivership proceedings, and filed its cross bill seeking a foreclosure, alleging an insufficiency of the security and praying by way of affirmative relief that, upon failure to redeem within the alloted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riehle v. MargoliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Attorney General v. Supreme Council American Legion of HonorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. L. Paul Dieffenbach, Jr. v. Attorney General of Vermont, Hazel M. Stevenson, Robert B. Young, First National Bank of Orwell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  2. Wornat Development Corp. v. VakalisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Hewey v. RichardsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
  4. Vermont National Bank v. LeninskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  5. United Savings Bank v. BarberSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API