State v. Riolo
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Arnold-Burger, J.:
When a person is convicted of a sexually violent crime and he or she has a prior Kansas conviction for a sexually violent crime or a conviction for a comparable offense in another state, the court is required to double the person’s prison sentence. This rule is known as the persistent sex offender rule. See K.S.A. 21-4704(j). George Riolo pled guilty to two different charges, both of which constituted sexually violent offenses under Kansas law. The State asserted that, due to a prior conviction in another state for a comparable crime, this special sentencing rule should…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. DaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. BarajasCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
- State v. Dinh Loc TaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. ChesbroCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
- United States v. De La Cruz-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WetrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- People v. LovatoColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. BuellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
- State v. FahnertCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
- State v. FahnertCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.