Legal Opinion

State v. Riolo

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 23, 2014No. 109,650PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Arnold-Burger, J.:

When a person is convicted of a sexually violent crime and he or she has a prior Kansas conviction for a sexually violent crime or a conviction for a comparable offense in another state, the court is required to double the person’s prison sentence. This rule is known as the persistent sex offender rule. See K.S.A. 21-4704(j). George Riolo pled guilty to two different charges, both of which constituted sexually violent offenses under Kansas law. The State asserted that, due to a prior conviction in another state for a comparable crime, this special sentencing rule should…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. DaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. State v. BarajasCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  3. State v. Dinh Loc TaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. State v. ChesbroCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  5. United States v. De La Cruz-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WetrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  2. People v. LovatoColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. BuellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
  4. State v. FahnertCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
  5. State v. FahnertCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API