Legal Opinion

Reale v. Providence and Worcester Railroad Company

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 28, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00990Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DANIEL REALE, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:23-cv-00990 (JAM) PROVIDENCE AND WORCESTER RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER OF REMAND TO STATE COURT The plaintiff does not like to wait for more than a few minutes when freight trains block a railroad crossing near his home. So he sued the railroad in state court, primarily relying on a state law that prohibits railroads from obstructing traffic for more than five minutes. The railroad removed the action to this Court on the ground of federal diversity jurisdiction. But diversity jurisdiction requires,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API