Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Kotthoff

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

This is an action to recover damages for breach of contract. Plaintiff is a farmer whose principal business consists of buying, raising and fattening sheep for the market. Defendant operates a feed and seed store in the town of Jefferson. Rosen rye is a species of rye which, when sowed, forms stools and is much more valuable for pasturage purposes than common rye which grows only with a single stalk. The testimony tends to show that the difference between the seed grown from Rosen rye and that grown from other varieties of rye can be determined only by experts.

Plaintiff, desiring to purchase…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. White v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. White v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Edgar v. Joseph Breck & Sons Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  4. Morse v. Union Stock Yard Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Hoffman v. DixonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Western Feed Co. v. HeidloffOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Sokoloski v. SplannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Henderson v. BerceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1946
  4. Webster v. KlassenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Blackburn v. Carlson Seed CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API