Blackburn v. Carlson Seed Company
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RUARK, Judge.
But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also.
Matthew 13:26
In this case the plaintiff, a farmer, purchased of the defendant, a seed merchant, 35 pounds of “sargo” seed. But as the blades matured the whole crop was revealed to be tares in the form of milo maize.
The plaintiff was not familiar with sargo seed and was innocent in planting the milo which defendant’s agent had handed him as and for “sargo.” According to the evidence, milo, in plaintiff’s vicinity, is grown for its seed grain and must have time to mature. It has little or no…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- City of Kennett v. Katz Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- Happy v. KentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Faire v. BurkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- National Paper Box Co. v. Aetna Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Tnemec Company, Inc. v. North Kansas City Development Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1956
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Denton Construction Co. v. Missouri State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Federal Crop Insurance Corporation v. Harold J. HesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Shechter v. BrewerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Albin Elevator Co. v. PavlicaWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Mills v. 1st National Bank of MexicoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.