Cook Inc. v. Boston Scientific Corp.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY and ORDER on plaintiffs motion for a protective order (doc. no. 64) and defendants’ cross-motion for a protective order (doc. no. 67).
FOSTER, United States Magistrate Judge.
In this case, the plaintiff, Cook, Inc., claims that the defendants are infringing one of its patents for a medical device known as a “Zstent”. Because commercially sensitive information has been and will be requested in discovery and the plaintiff and the defendants are direct competitors in many lines of medical devices, the parties agree that a protective order is warranted, but they disagree on the terms.
The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens First National Bank of Princeton v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Grove Fresh Distributors, Inc. v. Everfresh Juice Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Cumberland Packing Corp. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. v. Whirlpool CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
- Archer v. Kaufmann Property Management CorpDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
- Ashley Greene v. Trelleborg Sealing Solutions US, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025
- Bassett v. BurnsDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
- Doe v. Indiana Wesleyan UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.