Legal Opinion · Dissent

Greer v. United States Steel Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 1975No. Appeal, No. 1Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Spaeth, J.:

In my view, there are two reasons why the motion for judgment on the pleadings should not be granted: (l) there is an unresolved question of fact; and (2) although arguably the Occupational Disease Act, Act of June 21, 1939, P.L. 566, 77 P.S. §1201 et seq., requires that this issue of fact be resolved before a workmen’s compensation referee instead of a common pleas judge, the Supreme Court has decided otherwise in Perez v. Blumenthal Bros. Chocolate Co., 428 Pa. 225, 237 A.2d 227 (1968).

Pulmonary fibrosis is not one of the diseases specifically enumerated in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Dolan v. Linton's LunchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. UTTER v. Asten-Hill Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Burke v. Duquesne Light Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API