Legal Opinion

Evenson v. Osmose Wood Preserving Co. of America

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 18, 1990No. 89-1178PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.

This products liability action arises from injuries allegedly caused by the plaintiffs exposure to wood-treating chemicals. Gary E. Evenson appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for defendants Osmose Wood Preserving, Inc. (“Osmose”), Mineral Research & Development Corporation, Inc. (“Mineral Research”), and American Wood Preservers Institute (“American Wood”), on the ground that the district court erred in holding that the Indiana statute of limitations barred his action. For the reasons discussed below, we reverse and remand for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Linda Miller and Barry Miller v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. John Yorger v. Pittsburgh Corning CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Barnes v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Dribeck Importers, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. DeHoyos v. John Mohr & SonsDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Van Dusen v. StottsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Hildebrand v. HildebrandDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1990
  3. Evenson v. Osmose Wood Preserving, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1990
  4. Evenson v. Osmose Wood Preserving Company Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Booth v. WileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API