Legal Opinion

Ruth v. Carter-Kelly Lumber Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 1926No. 1339PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’QUINN, X

Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing, urging the same matters as on original hearing, and also presents a motion to disqualify Associate Justice O’Quinn, the writer of the opinion on original hearing, on the ground that he was of counsel for appellant in the case of Wm. Cameron & Co. v. Aldridge et al., alluded to in our original opinion, insisting that the subject-matter in Cameron v. Aldridge and the instant case, if not technically, was at least, in substance, the same. The writer has no recollection of haying taken any part in the trial of the Cameron-AIdridge suit, but…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. CahillTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. TodTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Galveston & Houston Investment Co. v. GrymesTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Taylor v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Glasscock v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lade v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Matlock v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Conner v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Marshburn v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API