Federal Trade Commission v. Noland, Jr.

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Federal Trade Commission, No. CV-20-00047-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 James D. Noland, Jr., et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is a “Rule 19 Motion to Dismiss or Compel Joinder of 16 Parties” filed by Defendants Jay Noland, Lina Noland, Thomas Sacca, and Scott Harris 17 (together, the “Individual Defendants”). (Doc. 167.) For the following reasons, the motion 18 will be denied. 19 BACKGROUND 20 The parties are familiar with the facts and history of this case, which are set out in…