Legal Opinion

United States v. Phoeun Lang

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 16, 2012No. 10-1353PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.

A jury found defendant Phoeun Lang (“Lang”) guilty of making false statements and applying for naturalization in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001(a)(2) and 1425(b). On appeal, Lang makes the following three arguments: (1) the admission of immigration form N-445 violated his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation, (2) the admission of immigration form N-445 under the public records exception to hearsay was error, 1 and (3) the government’s repeated reference to his prior conviction was unfairly prejudicial. Discerning no error, we affirm.

1. BACKGROUND

Accompanied by his…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. CameronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Humberto Duron-CalderaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  3. Linton v. SabaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. Ducoudray-AcevedoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. VelozCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API