Legal Opinion

South Carolina Retirement System Investment Commission v. Loftis

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 17, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2013-000754; No. 27242PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This Court accepted the petition of the South Carolina Retirement Investment Commission (the Commission) in its Original Jurisdiction to determine whether the Commission was entitled to a writ of mandamus requiring respondent, Curtis M. Loftis, Jr., in his capacity as custodian of the South Carolina Retirement Systems Group Trust, to authorize the funding of the Warburg Pincus Private Equity XI, L.P. investment (Warburg Pincus Fund XI). .The Court also agreed to expedite the matter based on the Commission’s assertion that • the failure to fund the investment by April 16, 2013, would cause the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sloan Ex Rel. State v. Friends of the Hunley, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Sloan v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Nelson v. OzmintSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Doe 53 v. Bishop of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wachesaw Plantation East Community Services Ass'n v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  2. Masters v. KOL, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API