Legal Opinion

Tanthongsack v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 27, 1995No. S95A0345PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Justice.

Appellant and a co-defendant were brought to trial before a jury and found guilty of malice murder, felony murder while in the commission of an aggravated assault, and aggravated assault. In accordance with Malcolm v. State, 263 Ga. 369, 373 (5) (434 SE2d 479) (1993), however, the trial court entered judgments of conviction and life sentences only as to the malice murder count. Thereafter, separate motions for new trial were filed and, when those motions were denied, separate notices of appeal were filed.1

1. Appellant urges that, because he is Laotian, he “may not” have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Malcolm v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  4. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Hendricks v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  3. Nanthabouthdy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Casey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  5. Department of Transportation v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API