Legal Opinion

Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. Lane

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1901No. 3,336PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Erom the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenley, C. J.

This was an action commenced by appellee Empson T. Lane upon an appeal bond executed to appellee Lane and the other obligees therein named by appellant and the Chicago & Southeastern Railway Company as principal, and Henry Moore, Henry Crawford, and D. M. Henry as sureties. The bond was given to stay and supersede an order and judgment against the said railway company, appellant herein. Hpon appeal this judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court. Appellee Lane made all the obligees in the bond, with the exception of three, defendants to the action. The three omitted, the complaint avers, died…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Durham v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Hadley v. HobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Wall v. GalvinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aetna Insurance v. ReymanIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. National Fire Insurance v. GellmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API