Legal Opinion

Aetna Insurance v. Reyman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1921No. 23,878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Orange Circuit Court; Bayless Harvey, Special Judge. Action by John W. Reyman against the Aetna Insurance Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1397 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 565.)

1Opinion of the CourtEwbank, J.

Appellee brought suit on a fire insurance policy for $1,000, covering certain buildings, engines, boilers, etc., originally issued to the estate of H. A. McCowen, which then owned the insured property, and afterward assigned to the appellee with the consent of the appellant company. The complaint alleged that a “loss payable clause” therein was inserted upon the sale and conveyance of the property to appellee and the execution by him of a mortgage to the executrix of the estate of said decedent, securing his notes for $4,250. The “loss payable clause,” recited as follows: “Any loss under this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. GilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Shoemaker v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Home InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Tate v. Ohio & Mississippi RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Continental Insurance v. BairIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Higgins v. SwygmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  2. National Fire Insurance v. GellmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API