Legal Opinion

Buck Glass Co. v. Gordy

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 20, 1936No. [No. 53, April Term, 1936.]PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

The question on this appeal is whether the appellant, a manufacturer of glass bottles, is, with respect to bottles made and supplied principally to sellers of milk and beer, subject to the Emergency Gross Receipts Tax of one per cent, imposed by chapter 188 of the Acts of 1935, Code, (Supp. 1935), art. 56, secs. 72A to 72Q, on the privilege of engaging in the business of selling at retail. The provisions of the act were described in the opinions in the cases of Jones v. Gordy, 169 Md. 173, 180 A. 272, and State v. Christhilf, 170 Md. 586, 185 A. 456, at this term of court. The appellant filed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Levin v. HewesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  2. Luman v. Hitchens Bros. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  3. Stiefel v. Maryland Institution for the Instruction of the BlindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  4. Jones v. GordyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  5. State Tax Commission v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Maguire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  2. Leonardo v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. Commissioners of Cambridge v. Eastern Shore Public Service Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  4. La Guardia v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  5. Board of Education v. WheatCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API