Donoho v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BLEIL, Justice.
Charles Donoho appeals his conviction of committing deviate sexual intercourse in a public place. After a jury trial, the court set punishment at a $250.00 fine and confinement for ninety days, probated for one year. The three grounds of error challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.
In reviewing sufficiency of the evidence questions we do not determine the credibility of the witnesses. We look at the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and determine whether there is evidence which the jury could have believed in arriving at their…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Resnick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Yarber v. PennellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Lobit v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Sinclair v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Donoho v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982