Legal Opinion

Smith & Furbush MacH. Co. v. Huycke

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 29, 1918No. 9189Published

Error from District Court, Greek County; Geo. W. Clark, Assigned Judge. Sulit toy the .American JNatiorjal Bfank against the Southwestern Bedding Company, in which Waldo Huycke was appointed receiver, and in which the Smith & Furbush Machine Company filed a petition of intervention. Judgment against intervener, and it brings error.

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

HARDY, C. J.

On petition for rehearing' it is again urged that it does not appear that the property sold by the Smith & Fu-r-bush Machine Company was in possession of the receiver at the time of the fire which destroyed the property of the Southwestern Bedding Company. Upon a re examination of the record we adhere to the original conclusion that the property was- taken possession of by the receiver, and was in his possession at the time of the fire which destroyed the plant of the Southwestern Bedding Company.

Our attention is called to a statement in tho opinion that…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lawson v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Ardmore Nat. Bank v. Briggs MacHinery & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Cronenwett v. Boston & A. Transp. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API