Renfroe v. Jones & Associates
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAY, Justice.
Appellant Rose Renfroe appeals from a summary judgment for appellees Thaddeus Freeman, Bryan Cannon, L. Kelly Jones, and Jones & Associates (collectively, J & A) in an action for wrongful garnishment. She raises two points of error. First, she complains that the trial court erred by ruling that she has no cause of action against J & A “based on their status as lawyers.” Next, she contends that the trial court erred by ruling there was no question of fact regarding her action pleaded against J & A. Because we find there are no questions of material fact and J & A is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Cantey Hanger, Llp v. Philip Gregory Byrd, Lucy Leasing Co., L.L.C., and Pgb Air, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
- Chapman Children's Trust v. Porter & Hedges, L.L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- IBP, Inc. v. Klumpe, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
- Mitchell v. Chapman, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
- Troice v. Greenberg Traurig, L.L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.