Legal Opinion
Schroepfer v. A. S. Abell Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 16, 1942No. 1609PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
This case is a civil suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219, by alleged employes of the defendant to recover deficiency in minimum wages together with liquidated damages and counsel fee, in accordance .with the liability therefor imposed by section 216(b). The defenses are: (1) that the plaintiffs were not employes of the defendant at all within the meaning of the Act; and (2) that the plaintiffs, if employes, were not engaged “in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce”. §§ 206, 207. The defendant is a Maryland corporation which…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Wrightwood Dairy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. A. S. Abell Company and Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Huntley v. Gunn Furniture Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1948
- Barbe v. Cummins Const. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1943
- Marshall v. Gerwill, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1980
- Schroepfer v. A. S. Abell Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.