Vance v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
The court of appeals’ consideration of this case occurred before the United States Supreme Court announced its decision in Consol. Rail Corp. v. Gottshall (1994), 512 U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 2396, 129 L.Ed.2d 427, which resolved some issues pertinent to this appeal. In light of Gottshall, this case presents two issues for our review: (1) Does plaintiffs claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress place him within the class of plaintiffs *227who may recover under the FELA? (2) If issue one is resolved in plaintiffs favor, did plaintiff sufficiently demonstrate that Conrail’s negligence caused his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Wahlstrom v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Graves v. North Eastern Services, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
- Graves v. No. E. Services Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
- Martin v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Cooke v. Montgomery CountyOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.