Legal Opinion

Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Union Mercantile Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 18, 1914PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeals from Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Turner

— Reversing on each appeal.

These were originally two common law actions instituted hy appellee on separate policies against the two appellants.

In August, 1911, while the policies were each in force, nearly all the property covered by them was destroyed hy fire.

The policy of the Connecticut Fire Insurance Company was dated the 7th of February, 1911, and insured appellee’s storehouse for $1,000 and its stock of goods *720carried therein for $4,000 against loss by fire. The policy of the Insurance Company of North America was dated the first of June, 1911, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. East Texas Fire Insurance v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Connecticut Fire Insurance v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Western Assurance Co. v. RayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  4. Corkery v. Security Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  5. Harding's Admr. v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Baltimore American Ins. Co. v. Pecos Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. Campbell v. Great Lakes Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Security Insurance Company v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Livingston County v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Roberts v. Fiscal Court of McLean CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API