Legal Opinion

Fetzer v. Vishneski

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1990No. 0268PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, Judge:

This appeal by J. Richard Vishneski arises from a judgment entered against him in an action for breach of an implied warranty of habitability. Appellees, Kurt and Janice Fetzer, entered into a construction contract with appellant for the construction of a new home for appellees, and construction was completed in September, 1984. Approximately six months after moving into their new house, appellees noticed that one of the house’s eight skylights was leaking. Eventually, all eight of the skylights began leaking.

During the next six to nine months, appellees telephoned and wrote to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Ecksel v. Orleans Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Allegheny County v. MonzoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Tyus v. RestaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Boeing Co. v. RooneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. Panorama Village Homeowners v. Golden RuleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Conway v. Cutler Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. In Re: M.B., Appeal of: PA State PoliceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Gloviak v. Tucci Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API