Ojeda De Toca v. Wise
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KILGARLIN, Justice.
We granted writ in this cause to determine whether imputed notice under the real property recording statutes operates as a defense to a buyer’s action for damages arising out of deceptive trade practices. See Tex.Bus. & Com.Code Ann. §§ 17.41-17.63 (Vernon 1987) (hereinafter DTPA). The court of appeals concluded that the imputed notice did operate as a DTPA defense and reversed a trial court judgment favorable to the buyer. 733 S.W.2d 325. We hold there is no such defense and accordingly reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
Rocío Ojeda de Toca purchased a house from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Westland Oil Development Corp. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- Buchanan v. Burnett and WifeTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Taylor v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- Crimmins v. LowryTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Graham v. RoderTexas Supreme Court · 1849
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Orca Assets G.P., L. L.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
- In Re Weekley Homes, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
- Munawar v. Cadle Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- Harry Spence and Nancy Spence Fortner v. Omaha Indemnity Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.