Legal Opinion

Fluor Corporation, Ltd. v. Gulf Interstate Gas Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 16, 1958No. 16985_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIVES, Circuit Judge.

The district court held invalid all claims, 1 to 12, inclusive, of the Stephens Patent No. 2,405,100. 1 In the opening paragraph of appellant’s brief, it is stated:

“Fluor ultimately asserted validity and infringement of claims 1 and 9 to 12 of the patent, which Gulf denied, and Gulf by its counterclaim asserted invalidity of all the claims in the patent, which assertion was denied by Fluor except as to claims 3 to 7.”

This Court is asked to review that part of the decision which holds invalid claims 1, 2, and 8 to 12, inclusive, of the patent. 2

The patent is concerned…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Toledo Pressed Steel Co. v. Standard Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Fluor Corp. v. Gulf Interstate Gas Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1957

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. General Steel Products Company v. LorenzDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1962
  2. Grinnell Corporation v. VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1967
  3. Tony Anthony v. Ranco IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Houston Oil Field Material Company, Inc. v. Robbins M. Claypool and David M. Best, D/B/A Gulf Tool CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  5. Mohasco Industries, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API