Legal Opinion
United States v. Charles Patrick Carney Appeal of Francis Clinton Mahon, Jr
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 31, 1972No. 71-1965PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Appellant, Francis Clinton Ma-hon, Jr., was convicted of conspiracy. Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 371 (1966). The conspiracy charge arose from the interstate transportation of forged securities. One substantial issue has been raised in this appeal. 1
John Blandford, indicted as a co-conspirator, was called and testified as a government witness. The final questions and answers on his direct examination were as follows:
“Q Do you like Francis Mahon?
A No, I don’t.
Q Why are you testifying today?
A Because it is the truth and I think it ought to be told.
Q Why don’t you like Mr. Mahon?
A…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by20 opinions
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Dowling, Reuben. Appeal of Reuben DowlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- State v. IaukeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. IaukeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
- United States of America, at Nos. 89-5372/5383, at No. 89-5510 v. Gaetano Vastola, at No. 89-5372, at No. 89-5510 v. Elias Saka, at No. 89-5383Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Reginald Cochran, William Ronald Watson, and William Robert Bland,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.