Ex Parte Fidelity Bank
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
Fidelity Bank f/k/a Fidelity National Bank ("Fidelity") petitions this Court for a writ a mandamus directing the trial court to dismiss it as a defendant in an action brought by Allen Austin and other plaintiffs from Alabama and various other states (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Austin") on the basis of lack of personal jurisdiction.1 We deny the petition.
On September 12, 2001, Austin sued several defendants in the Shelby Circuit Court seeking damages…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Ex Parte PuccioSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Ex Parte RawlsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Ex Parte AntonucciSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Ex Parte BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Knutsen v. CloudIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.