Ex Parte Puccio
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
John Puccio petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus ordering the trial court to grant his Rule 12(b)(2), Ala. R. Civ. P., motion to dismiss him as a defendant in an action brought by Richard Grant and Abigayle Grant on the basis that the trial court lacks personal jurisdiction over him.
On October 22, 2003, the Grants sued Cambridge Credit Counseling Corporation, Puccio, Jessica Spence, and several fictitiously named parties in the Montgomery Circuit Court, seeking damages and injunctive relief arising out of the Grants' participation in a debt-management program offered by Cambridge…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Time Share Vacation Club v. Atlantic Resorts, Ltd. And Coastal Marketing Associates, Inc. And Schuman, Martin L., JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Katie Lowery v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Ex Parte City of TuskegeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- 27001 Partnership v. Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
- JC DUKE & ASSOCIATES GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC. v. WestSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Ex Parte AtchleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.