Legal Opinion

London v. Smart

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 24, 1928PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhilbrook, J.

This is an action on the case in which the plaintiff charges the defendant, in the first count, with alienation of the affections of his wife; the second cóunt alleges criminal conversation. The plaintiff recovered a verdict of $5,000 and the case is before this court on defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict upon the general grounds that the verdict is against law and evidence and that the damages are excessive; and also motion to set aside the verdict on the grounds of newly discovered evidence. There are no exceptions.

The testimony offered before the jury would perhaps fall short of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. M'lanahan v. the Universal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Beals v. ConeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  3. West v. PlattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. LedgerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. State v. CasaleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  3. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  4. Boynton v. AdamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  5. Depositors Trust Co. v. Farm Family Life Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API