Legal Opinion

James v. Illinois

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 10, 1990No. 88-6075PublishedCited by 162 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

The impeachment exception to the exclusionary rule permits the prosecution in a criminal proceeding to introduce il*309legally obtained evidence to impeach the defendant’s own testimony. The Illinois Supreme Court extended this exception to permit the prosecution to impeach the testimony of all defense witnesses with illegally obtained evidence. 123 Ill. 2d 523, 528 N. E. 2d 723 (1988). Finding this extension inconsistent with the balance of values underlying our previous applications of the exclusionary rule, we reverse.

H-l

On the night of August 30, 1982, eight young boys returning home from a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by162 opinions

  1. Utah v. StrieffSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Utah v. StrieffSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. State v. Electroplating, Inc.Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  5. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API