Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. Glover Printing & Stationery Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
The plaintiff, suing in trover for certain linotype equipment, claimed title by virtue of a contract by which the defendant conveyed to it a certain linotjrpe machine "complete as equipped,” contending that the equipment sued for was attached to the machine at the time the conveyance was made. The defendant contended that the words "complete as equipped” were ambiguous, and, according to the negotiations of the parties leading up to the conveyance, meant complete as equipped when the machine *635was originally acquired by the defendant from the plaintiff, without the equipment sued for, rather…
2Cited by9 opinions
- American Casualty Co. v. Crain-Daly Volkswagen, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- California Insurance v. BlumburgCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- DI Corbett Electric, Inc. v. Venture Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Houston v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Jerry Lipps, Inc. v. LewallenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.