Merrill v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Error to the District Court, Sheridan County; HoN. Carroll H. Parmelee, Judge. The material facts are stated in the opinion. The verdict was insufficient for failing to find the value of the property stolen. (Comp.
Read the full summary
Error to the District Court, Sheridan County; HoN. Carroll H. Parmelee, Judge. The material facts are stated in the opinion. The verdict was insufficient for failing to find the value of the property stolen. (Comp. Stat. 1910, Sec. 6252; Armstrong v. State, 21 O. St. 357; Holmes v. State, 58 Neb. 297> N. W. 641; McCoy v. State, 22 Neb. 418, 35 N. W. 202; Fisher v. State, 52 Neb. 531, 72 N. W. 954; Bartley v. State, 53 Neb. 310; Holman v. State, 58 Neb. 297, 78 N. W. 641; Thomson v. State, (Wyo.) 130 Pac. 850). The court should have excluded the testimony of Andrew Kosine as irrelevant.…
1Opinion of the Court
Beard, Justice.
The plaintiff in error, Ote Merrill, was convicted, in the District Court of Sheridan County, of the crime of larceny and sentenced to a term in the penitentiary. From that judgment he brings the case here on error.
The information charged the defendant (plaintiff in error) with the larceny of one head of neat cattle, the prop^ erty of one Stella Kosine. On the trial the jury returned a Verdict as follows: . “We, the jury, duly impanelled and sworn in the above entitled cause, do find the defendant, Ote Merrill, guilty as charged in the information.” It is contended that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Thomson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. ChambersWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
- Buckles v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Harris v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. Le MastersWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.