Legal Opinion

Professional Lawn Care Association v. Village of Milford

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 1, 1990No. 89-2141PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILBURN, Circuit Judge.

The defendant-appellant, Village of Milford, Michigan, enacted Ordinance No. 197, which imposes registration, posting and notice requirements upon commercial “users of pesticides.” The district court enjoined the village from enforcing the ordinance on the ground that it was impliedly preempted by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”), .7 U.S.C. *930§§ 136-136y. The village then filed this timely appeal. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

I

A

Defendant-appellant Village of Milford is a political subdivision of the State of Michigan.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Wright v. Dow Chemical U.S.A.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1993
  3. City of Lodi v. RandtronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Conejo Wellness Center, Inc. v. City of Agoura HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Chemical Specialties Manufacturers Ass'n v. AllenbyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API