Legal Opinion · Dissent

E. H. Oftedal & Sons, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Montana Transportation Commission

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 2002No. Docket 01-022Published

1DissentJustice Cotter

¶60 I dissent. Not only does the majority’s conclusion completely upset the public contract bidding process, it jettisons basic contract principles of offer and acceptance, and ignores the tenets of equitable relief. The ultimate effect of this Opinion is to impose a stricter obligation on MDT to find mistakes in a submitted bid than is imposed on the bidder himself; thus allowing a bidder to amend an offer, after it is accepted, even though he created the offer in haste, failed to use care in checking the details prior to submitting the offer, failed to effectively rule out suspicions that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lee v. USAA Casualty InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Kauffman-Harmon v. KauffmanMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Stuewe v. HindsonMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State ex rel. Robert Mitchell Furniture Co. v. TooleMontana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Chadwick v. GibersonMontana Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API