Legal Opinion

Noren v. Hankee

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 5, 1954No. 36,170PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Action is brought by plaintiff to recover for personal injuries allegedly caused by the negligence of defendant’s employees. The jury returned a verdict for defendant and plaintiff moved for a new trial. Defendant appeals from the trial court’s order granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

At the time of the oral argument we questioned the appealability of the order, and subsequently, we requested briefs on the issue of its appealability.

M. S. A. 605.09 provides in part as follows:

“An appeal may be taken to the supreme court by the aggrieved party in the following cases:

% -a* ■H* #

“(4) *…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Von Bank v. MayerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Satter v. TurnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Smith v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Anderson v. JennieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Ronningen v. SonterreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. Peterson v. SchulteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API