State v. Harris
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice:
Defendant Ersell Harris, Jr., seeks to reverse his conviction by a jury of the crime-of forgery. He contends (1) that because he had been previously charged with the crime of issuing a fictitious check arising out of the same incident, which charge had been dismissed, he has been placed in jeopardy twice for the same offense; and (2) that he was denied the right of adequate representation by counsel.
We accept without reservation defendant’s urgence that he should not be subject to prosecution twice for the same offense. Section 12, Article I of our Utah Constitution…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. LawrenceUtah Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. ThatcherUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- Gallegos v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. FranklinUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. SosaUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Harris v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1975