Legal Opinion

Fobbs v. Wilson

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 15, 2021No. 3:17-cv-03901-JCSUnknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WILLIAM B. FOBBS, Case No. 17-cv-03901-JCS 8 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR 9 v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES 10 FRANK KENDALL, Re: Dkt. No. 73 Defendant. 11 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff William Fobbs accepted an offer of judgment under Rule 68 of the Federal Rules 15 of Civil Procedure that Defendant the Secretary of the Air Force (the “Secretary”) served on May 16 4, 2021. That accepted offer included “reasonable attorneys’ fees to the date of this offer in an 17 amount to be determined by the Court.” Dkt. 68-1 ¶ 3.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Roberta Miller v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API