Ex parte Darling
Nevada Supreme Court
Habeas corpus, before the supreme court. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Hawley, J.:
Petitioner is held in confinement in the state prison under a commitment, issued on the sixteenth day of November, 1872, ordering him to be imprisoned for the term of ten years. He claims that he is entitled to his discharge under the amended act “for the government of the state prison” (approved March 1, 1881), which provides that every convict faithfully performing such labor as may be required of him by the rules and regulations of the prison “shall be allowed from his term, instead and in lieu of the commutation heretofore allowed by law, a deduction of two months…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Langever v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Stocks v. StocksNevada Supreme Court · 1947
- Opinion of the Justices to the Governor & CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- In re MelosevichNevada Supreme Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Howell v. WildesNevada Supreme Court · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.