Legal Opinion

Bastian v. Brink

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 19, 1951No. 35,318PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Plaintiffs, Howard Bastían and Helen Bastían, his wife, record owners as joint tenants of the northeasterly 41 feet of the rear southwesterly 88 feet of lot 1, and the northeasterly 89 feet of the southwesterly 88 feet of the southeasterly % of lot 2, block 4, St, Anthony Falls Addition to Minneapolis, bring this action in ejectment against defendant, Nathaniel T. Brink, alleged to be wrong fully in possession of the described premises and the dwelling house thereon.

Defendant disputes plaintiffs’ ownership of the property and asserts that he and his wife, Julia A.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Carr v. . CarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Converse v. Burrows & PrettymanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1858
  4. Conklin v. HindsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  5. Luse v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dietz v. DietzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Freundschuh v. FreundschuhCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API