Legal Opinion

Henry Clay v. Jersey City

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 22, 1964PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

84 N.J. Super. 9 (1964)

200 A.2d 787

HENRY CLAY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, AND VAN LEER MANUFACTURING CORP., a NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT,

v.

CITY OF JERSEY CITY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 21, 1963.

Decided May 22, 1964.

Before Judges GAULKIN, FOLEY and LEWIS.

Mr. Meyer Pesin, Corporation Counsel of the City of Jersey City, argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Joseph G. Mintz and Gustave A. Peduto, Assistants…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. 525 Main Street Corp. v. Eagle Roofing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Cloyes v. Township of DelawareSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Handleman v. CoxSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. Abeles v. Adams Engineering Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  5. Henry Clay v. Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Comdyne I, Inc. v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. People Express Airlines, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. CPC Int'l, Inc. v. Bor. of Englewood CliffsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  4. Mayfair Fabrics v. HENLEYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Harvard v. Bushberg Bros., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API