Legal Opinion

Poston v. City of McAlester

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 17, 1928No. 18075PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEFNER. J.

The plaintiff, Nellie Poston, sued the city of McAlester, defendant, for damages in the sum of $3,000 accruing to her because the defendant had constructed a dam across Bull creek. The plaintiff owned 330 acres of land in Pittsburg county, which consisted in the main of rocky pasture land not subject to cultivation; a small portion of the land, however, was tillable. The land lying along the creek was fertile and capable of producing crops. The other land was used for grazing purposes. She alleges that by reason of the defendant’s construction of the .dam across Bull creek, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Watts v. Norfolk & W. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. White v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. McCarty v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  4. Radke v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Hodge v. Lehigh Val. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Highway Commission v. HornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Grand River Dam Authority v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API