Radke v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Freeborn county, Farmer, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict of $150 for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the Court
Dickinson, J.1
This action is for the recovery of damages for the overflowing of the plaintiff’s land, by reason of the embankment of the defendant’s railroad having prevented the natural flow or drainage of water off the same. The recovery is sought upon the ground that the defendant negligently constructed its road, not putting in such a culvert as was necessary to carry the water from the east to the west side of the railroad, as it had been accustomed to flow. The land injuriously affected is a nearly level tract, of about seven acres, in a ravine or marsh adjacent to and east of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McCarty v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jungblum v. Minneapolis, New Ulm & Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- McDonald v. S. Cal. Ry.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Poynter v. County of Otter TailSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Sweeney v. Montana Central Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
- Evans v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.