Legal Opinion

Saito v. McKesson HBOC, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 11, 2002No. 376, 2001PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice.

In this appeal, we consider the limitations on a stockholder’s statutory right to inspect corporate books and records. The statute, 8 Del.C. § 220, enables stockholders to investigate matters “reasonably related to [their] interest as [stockholders]” including, among other things, possible corporate wrongdoing. It does not open the door td the wide ranging discovery that would be available in support of litigation. For this statutory tool to be mean ingful, however, it cannot be read narrowly to deprive a stockholder of necessary documents solely because the documents were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  2. Security First Corp. v. U.S. Die Casting & Development Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  3. CM & M GROUP, INC. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  4. Skouras v. Admiralty Enterprises, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1978
  5. Shaw v. Agri-Mark, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Bank v. Yahoo! Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
  2. Seinfeld v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  3. Carlson v. HallinanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Indiana Electrical Workers Pension Trust Fund IBEWSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  5. KT4 Partners LLC v. Palantir Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2019

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API