Legal Opinion
In Re Contractor Technology, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 25, 2007No. 7:23-mj-00007PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NANCY F. ATLAS, District Judge.
Appellant Hirschfeld Steel Co., Inc. (“Hirschfeld”) appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court’s April 16, 2007 Memorandum Opinion (“April Opinion”) and the corresponding June 14, 2007 Final Judgment. Having considered the parties’ submissions, all matters of record, and ap plicable legal authorities, the Court affirms the Bankruptcy Court’s decision.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Debtor Contractor Technology, Ltd. (“Contractor Technology”) was the prime contractor on public works projects in Texas, including a road and bridge…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. GlashTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Brenda A. Gowesky, M.D. v. Singing River Hospital Systems, D/B/A Ocean Springs HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Harris County, Texas v. Carmax Auto Superstores IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Brown v. AmesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Angles v. Flexible Flyer Liquidating TrustDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2012