Legal Opinion

Williams & Manning v. Southern Mutual Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1932No. Appeal 209PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This was an action on a fire insurance policy for $2,000 covering the buildings, machinery and stock and material of the plaintiff company. The total insurance on the property amounted to $403,000, divided among twenty-seven companies. The sound value of the buildings was admitted to be $133,835.37, and the loss or damage to them $90,129.09. The parties could not agree as to the sound value of or loss or damage to (1). the machinery and equipmént, and (2) the stock and material.

Four main questions are raised by the appeal: (1) Should the court have submitted to the jury…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. Baltimore Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Allegro v. Rural Valley Mut. Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Siter v. MorrsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
  4. West Branch Lumberman's Exchange v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. Specktor v. Victory Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. v. Board of Ed.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. J. Purdy Cope Hotels Co. v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Williams v. Lumbermen's InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. McCoy v. Home InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. In Re PodolskyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API