Legal Opinion

Greene County v. Knight

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 4, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, 0.-J'.,

(after stating the facts). In Browning v. Waldrip, 169 Ark. 261, 273 S. W. 1032, it was held that certiorari lies to quash a void judgment even though the judgment might have been vacated and set aside on appeal. In Miller v. Tatum, 170 Ark. 152, 279 S. W. 1002, it was held that a judgment that is not void cannot be quashed on certiorari, but, if held erroneous, it may be reversed on appeal. It was further held that an application for certiorari to quash a judgment that is not void will be treated as an appeal, where the time for appeal has not expired. Again, in Taylor v. Bay…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. TatumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  2. Independence County v. LesterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Dickerson v. Tri-County Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  4. Road District No. 6 v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  5. Browning v. WaldripSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flake v. Thompson, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. CoffeltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API