Legal Opinion

Adetokunbo Adejumo v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 7, 2018No. 16-3050PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRAS, Circuit Judge.

Adetokunbo Olubunmi Adejumo moved under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his sentence for bank fraud and aggravated identity theft. His theory was that his counsel was ineffective by failing to do two things that a reasonable attorney would have done: advise him of the consequences of testifying at a pretrial-release revocation hearing and object to the amount of loss suffered by the victims of the fraud. The district court 1 denied both claims without holding an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

I

Adejumo, as well as several accomplices, devised a scheme to use stolen identity…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. MandujanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Corey Earl Engelen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Jesse WalnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  2. Blakeney v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  3. Bridges v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2023
  4. Ferguson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2022
  5. Flenoid v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API