Adetokunbo Adejumo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STRAS, Circuit Judge.
Adetokunbo Olubunmi Adejumo moved under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his sentence for bank fraud and aggravated identity theft. His theory was that his counsel was ineffective by failing to do two things that a reasonable attorney would have done: advise him of the consequences of testifying at a pretrial-release revocation hearing and object to the amount of loss suffered by the victims of the fraud. The district court 1 denied both claims without holding an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
I
Adejumo, as well as several accomplices, devised a scheme to use stolen identity…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. MandujanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Corey Earl Engelen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Jesse WalnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Blakeney v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
- Bridges v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2023
- Ferguson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2022
- Flenoid v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.