Legal Opinion
Epstein v. Kuvin
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 23, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
25 N.J. Super. 210 (1953)
95 A.2d 753
FRIEDA KUVIN EPSTEIN, EXECUTRIX, ETC., AND ANOTHER, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
HERBERT KUVIN, AND OTHERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 2, 1953.
Decided March 23, 1953.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW and JAYNE.
Mr. Max M. Albach argued the cause for the respondents.
Mr. Harry Green argued the cause for the appellants.
The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.
We must construe the following clause in the last will and testament of Mrs. Fannie Kuvin:
"Should I die before my grandson, Sanford Kuvin,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- President of the Manhattan Co. v. ArmourSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- In Re the Accounting of KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Shepard v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. NollNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Wood v. WoodNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Darpino v. D'ArpinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- In Re HoffmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.