Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CF&I Steel, L.P. v. United Steel Workers of America

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 29, 2001No. 99SC587Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Coats

While I have no objection to returning this case to the trial court for clarification of the grounds for its injunction, I disagree with several basic premises for the majority's constitutional holding. Because I believe that courts lack jurisdiction under the Colorado Labor Peace Act to enjoin residential labor picketing that is not coercive or intimidating and because I believe that such an injunction by a state court would, in any event, be preempted by operation of the National Labor Relations Act, I would reverse the court of appeals' determination that the domiciliary picketing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Youngdahl v. Rainfair, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 1416 v. Ariadne Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API