Legal Opinion

In Re Shmuckler

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 30, 2009No. 07-BG-389, 07-BG-702PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that respondent Howard R. Shmuckler be disbarred pursuant to D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (2001), because he was convicted of bankruptcy fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152(1) and (2) by the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Bar Counsel has taken no exception to the-Board’s report. Respondent’s opposition challenges the underlying facts that led to the bankruptcy fraud conviction, but does not dispute the fact that he was convicted. Since bankruptcy fraud is a crime that inherently involves moral turpitude,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. In Re LefflerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. In Re SugarmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. In re StandardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re ZodrowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API